From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aldrich v. Employment Division

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 23, 1985
694 P.2d 1029 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

83-AB-1580; CA A29512

Argued and submitted May 4, 1984

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration February 6, 1985 Reconsideration denied June 7, 1985 Petition for review denied July 23, 1985 ( 299 Or. 522)

Judicial Review from Employment Appeals Board.

Donald S. Richardson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Kathryn T. Whalen, and Richardson Murphy, Portland.

William F. Nessly, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.

No appearance by respondent Northwest Marine Iron Works.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Van Hoomissen, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. See Cropley v. Employment Div., 72 Or. App. 93, 694 P.2d 1025 (1985).

Buttler, P. J., specially concurring.


For the reasons stated in my dissent in Cropley v. Employment Division, 72 Or. App. 93, 694 P.2d 1025 (1985), 1 would reverse the decision of EAB. However, unlike in Cropley, it appears that some of the petitioners here may have joined the strike and would not be entitled to unemployment compensation. Barrier v. Employment Division, 29 Or. App. 387, 563 P.2d 1230 (1977). Accordingly, I would remand this case for a determination limited to which petitioners, if any, joined the strike.


Summaries of

Aldrich v. Employment Division

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 23, 1985
694 P.2d 1029 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Aldrich v. Employment Division

Case Details

Full title:ALDRICH et al, Petitioners, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION et al, Respondents

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 23, 1985

Citations

694 P.2d 1029 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
694 P.2d 1029

Citing Cases

Cropley v. Employment Division

On April 18, a strike began. The 22 claimants in the companion cases, Aldrich v. Employment Division, 72 Or.…

Claimant Members of Boilermakers Local 72 v. Employment Division

We recently decided two cases involving similar issues. In Cropley v. Employment Division, 72 Or. App. 93,…