From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alderson v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Dec 22, 2017
No. 3:16-cv-02063-SU (D. Or. Dec. 22, 2017)

Opinion

No. 3:16-cv-02063-SU

12-22-2017

JAMES ALDERSON, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation (#24) on October 30, 2017, in which she recommends that this Court deny Plaintiff's Request for Immediate Remand, and reverse and remand the Commissioner's decision to deny Plaintiff disability benefits. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings & Recommendation [24]. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to remand/request for immediate remand [20] is denied. However, the Commissioner's decision is reversed and this case is remanded for further administrative proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 22 day of December, 2017.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Alderson v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Dec 22, 2017
No. 3:16-cv-02063-SU (D. Or. Dec. 22, 2017)
Case details for

Alderson v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ALDERSON, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Dec 22, 2017

Citations

No. 3:16-cv-02063-SU (D. Or. Dec. 22, 2017)