. To the extent petitioner seeks review of the court's denial of his motion for leave to reargue, the denial of a motion for leave to reargue is not appealable (seeAldalali v. Sungold Assoc. Ltd. Partnership, 172 A.D.3d 555, 556, 98 N.Y.S.3d 741 [1st Dept. 2019] ). We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Although plaintiffs’ cross motion was denominated as one for leave to renew and reargue, they sought only reargument, and no appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue ( Aldalali v. Sungold Assoc. Ltd. Partnership , 172 A.D.3d 555, 556, 98 N.Y.S.3d 741 [1st Dept. 2019] ).
Petitioner's decision to perform additional research about the area that was designated a historic district only after the court issued its order and judgment does not warrant renewal. The denial of a motion for leave to reargue is not appealable ( Aldalali v. Sungold Assoc. Ltd. Partnership, 172 A.D.3d 555, 98 N.Y.S.3d 741 [1st Dept. 2019] ). We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.