Aldalali v. Sungold Assocs. Ltd.

3 Citing cases

  1. Patterson v. City of New York

    221 A.D.3d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

    . To the extent petitioner seeks review of the court's denial of his motion for leave to reargue, the denial of a motion for leave to reargue is not appealable (seeAldalali v. Sungold Assoc. Ltd. Partnership, 172 A.D.3d 555, 556, 98 N.Y.S.3d 741 [1st Dept. 2019] ). We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

  2. Yocum v. United States Tennis Ass'n

    208 A.D.3d 1124 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)   Cited 3 times

    Although plaintiffs’ cross motion was denominated as one for leave to renew and reargue, they sought only reargument, and no appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue ( Aldalali v. Sungold Assoc. Ltd. Partnership , 172 A.D.3d 555, 556, 98 N.Y.S.3d 741 [1st Dept. 2019] ).

  3. Chan v. N.Y.C. Landmarks Pres. Comm'n

    182 A.D.3d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)   Cited 1 times

    Petitioner's decision to perform additional research about the area that was designated a historic district only after the court issued its order and judgment does not warrant renewal. The denial of a motion for leave to reargue is not appealable ( Aldalali v. Sungold Assoc. Ltd. Partnership, 172 A.D.3d 555, 98 N.Y.S.3d 741 [1st Dept. 2019] ). We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.