From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alcorn v. Brandeman

Supreme Court of California,Department Two
Sep 21, 1910
158 Cal. 410 (Cal. 1910)

Opinion

Sac. No. 1678.

September 21, 1910.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County and from an order refusing a new trial. W.B. Nutter, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Wm. Craig, and J.F. Ramage, for Appellants.

Thos. S. Louttit, Clary Louttit, and W.W. Middlecoff, for Respondent.


Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment in favor of the defendant and from an order denying their motion for a new trial. This action was brought to quiet title to a tract of land in San Joaquin County, and involves the validity of a conveyance made by one Kyle as attorney in fact for plaintiffs and one Sebree to Olive A. Jennings, under whom defendant claims.

This appeal presents practically the same questions as are involved in the case of Alcorn v. Gieseke (Sac. No. 1693), ante, p. 396, [ 111 P. 98], this day decided, affirming the judgment and order of the trial court. The defendants in both cases claim under Jennings to two separate portions of a larger tract conveyed to her by the deed whose validity is involved, and on the authority of Alcorn v. Gieseke, the judgment and order in the present appeal are affirmed.

Hearing in Bank denied.


Summaries of

Alcorn v. Brandeman

Supreme Court of California,Department Two
Sep 21, 1910
158 Cal. 410 (Cal. 1910)
Case details for

Alcorn v. Brandeman

Case Details

Full title:JAMES BEN ALCORN et al., Appellants, v. HENRY BRANDEMAN, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of California,Department Two

Date published: Sep 21, 1910

Citations

158 Cal. 410 (Cal. 1910)
111 P. 104