Alcohol Monitoring Sys., Inc. v. Actsoft, Inc.

Full title: ALCOHOL MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ACTSOFT, INC.…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 1, 2013

499 F. App'x 974 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Opinion

2012-1066

03-01-2013

ALCOHOL MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ACTSOFT, INC., OHIO HOUSE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC. AND US HOME DETENTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

MICHAEL G.MARTIN, Lathrop & Gage LLP, of Denver, Colorado, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were PHILIP S.LORENZO and JAMES E. DALLNER. KYLE B.FLEMING, Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were TODD R.TUCKER and NICHOLAS J.GINGO, for Actsoft, Inc., et al. Of counsel on the brief were Richard E. Fee and Kathleen M. Wade, Fee & Jeffries P.A., of Tampa, Florida, for Actsoft, Inc.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in consolidated Nos. 07-CV-2261 and 08-CV-1226, Judge Philip A. Brimmer.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL G.MARTIN, Lathrop & Gage LLP, of Denver, Colorado, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were PHILIP S.LORENZO and JAMES E. DALLNER.

KYLE B.FLEMING, Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were TODD R.TUCKER and NICHOLAS J.GINGO, for Actsoft, Inc., et al. Of counsel on the brief were Richard E. Fee and Kathleen M. Wade, Fee & Jeffries P.A., of Tampa, Florida, for Actsoft, Inc. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_______________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk