Opinion
Civil Action No. 07-cv-02261-PAB-MJW consolidated with 08-cv-01226-PAB-MJW
10-17-2011
ALCOHOL MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ACTSOFT, INC., OHIO HOUSE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC., and US HOME DETENTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT, INC., Defendants.
Judge Philip A. Brimmer
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S
OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT'S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS
This matter comes before the court on plaintiff's Objections to Defendant's Deposition Designations [Docket No. 318].
The Court rules as follows:
J. ROBERT ZETTL
+-------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Item # ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Testimony ¦Objection ¦Ruling ¦ ¦Ex. A ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +--------+------------+-----------------------------+---------¦ ¦ ¦3:1-7:1; ¦1. Hearsay, FRCP 32(a)(1)(C);¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦1. ¦11:25-18:13;¦FRCP 32(a)(4); FRE 802; ¦Overruled¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦57:2-13 ¦FRE 803 ¦ ¦ +--------+------------+-----------------------------+---------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦1. Relevance, FRE 402 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦2. Unfair prejudice, FRE 403 ¦ ¦ ¦2. ¦76:5-22 ¦ ¦Overruled¦ ¦ ¦ ¦3. Hearsay, FRCP 32(a)(1)(C);¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦FRE 802; FRE 803 ¦ ¦ +--------+------------+-----------------------------+---------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦1. Relevance, FRE 402 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦2. Unfair prejudice, FRE 403 ¦ ¦ ¦3. ¦84:1-86:18 ¦ ¦Overruled¦ ¦ ¦ ¦3. Hearsay, FRCP 32(a)(1)(C);¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦FRE 802; FRE 803 ¦ ¦ +-------------------------------------------------------------+
DAVID BEAZLEY
+-----------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Item # ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Testimony ¦Objection ¦Ruling ¦ ¦Ex. B ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +--------+-------------+--------------------------+---------¦ ¦ ¦4:1-5; 10:17-¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦11:16; 11:22-¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Hearsay; FRCP 32; FRE 802;¦ ¦ ¦1. ¦12:3; 17:19- ¦ ¦Overruled¦ ¦ ¦ ¦FRE 803 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦21:21; and ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦23:18-24:11 ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------+
BY THE COURT:
PHILIP A. BRIMMER
United States District Judge