Opinion
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00301-DME-CBS
12-10-2012
ORDER RE: JOINT MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
REGARDING POST-MARKMAN DEADLINES
This matter comes before the Court on the Parties' Joint Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order regarding post-Markman deadlines [Dkt. #122] (the "Motion"). The Court, having reviewed the Joint Motion and having been fully advised in the premises, finds good cause grant the Motion. Therefore, it is:
ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED, and the Court's Scheduling Order [Dkt. # 28] is amended as follows:
XI. CASE PLAN AND SCHEDULE
L. Post -Markman Deadlines:
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦ ¦Final Infringement, Invalidity and Unenforceability ¦ ¦1.¦February 15, 2013¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Contentions. ¦ +--+-----------------+----------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦The party bearing the burden of proof shall disclose¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦2.¦March 1, 2013 ¦information specified under Rule 26 concerning its ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦expert witnesses. ¦ +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦ ¦The party against which an expert is endorsed ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦pursuant to the preceding paragraph shall endorse ¦ ¦3.¦April 1, 2013 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦any responsive information as specified in Rule 26¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦concerning its rebuttal experts. ¦ +--+--------------+--------------------------------------------------¦ ¦4.¦April 30, 2013¦Discovery Cut-off. ¦ +--+--------------+--------------------------------------------------¦ ¦5.¦May 31, 2013 ¦Dispositive Motions Deadline. ¦ +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ DATED at Denver, Colorado, on December 10, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
________
Craig B. Shaffer
United States Magistrate Judge