Opinion
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00301-DME-CBS
02-12-2013
ORDER RE: JOINT MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
REGARDING POST-MARKMAN DEADLINES
This matter comes before the Court on the Parties' Joint Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order regarding post-Markman deadlines [Dkt. # 125] (the "Motion"). The Court, having reviewed the Joint Motion and having been fully advised in the premises, finds good cause and grants the Motion. Therefore, it is:
ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED, and the Court's Scheduling Order [Dkt. # 28] is amended as follows:
XI. CASE PLAN AND SCHEDULE
L. Post-Markman Deadlines:
+-------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦15 days after Federal¦Final Infringement, Invalidity and¦ ¦(1.)¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Circuit Opinion ¦Unenforceability Contentions. ¦ +-------------------------------------------------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦15 days after ¦The party bearing the burden of proof shall disclose ¦ ¦(2.)¦Infringement ¦information specified under Rule 26 concerning its ¦ ¦ ¦Contentions ¦expert witnesses. ¦ +----+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦30 days after ¦The party against which an expert is endorsed pursuant ¦ ¦(3.)¦Plaintiff's ¦to the preceding paragraph shall endorse any responsive¦ ¦ ¦expert ¦information as specified in Rule 26 concerning its ¦ ¦ ¦disclosure ¦rebuttal experts. ¦ +----+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦30 days after ¦ ¦ ¦(4.)¦Defendants' ¦Discovery Cut-off. ¦ ¦ ¦expert ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦disclosure ¦ ¦ +----+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦30 days after ¦ ¦ ¦(5.)¦Discovery ¦Dispositive Motions Deadline. ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Cut-off ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
BY THE COURT
_____________________
United States District Court Judge
United States Magistrate Judge