From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Albury v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 10, 1987
503 So. 2d 460 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-769.

March 10, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Harold Solomon, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.


The trial court departed from the recommended guidelines sentence of two-and-a-half to three-and-a-half years imprisonment and sentenced Albury to ten years imprisonment upon a finding that Albury was a habitual offender. In Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla. 1986), decided after the trial court imposed sentence on Albury, the Florida Supreme Court held that the habitual offender statute, § 775.084, Fla. Stat. (1985), is neither an alternative to guidelines sentencing nor an adequate reason for departure from the recommended guidelines sentence. Whitehead thus compels reversal of the sentence and a remand for resentencing within the recommended guidelines.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Albury v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 10, 1987
503 So. 2d 460 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Albury v. State

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL ALBURY, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 10, 1987

Citations

503 So. 2d 460 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Shull v. Dugger

Some of our district courts, however, have distinguished the situation where the only reason given for…

Morganti v. State

The same also appears to be true with regard to the Fifth District. Frierson v. State, 511 So.2d 1016 (Fla.…