Opinion
3:21cv-738-jdp
04-29-2022
ORDER ON THE PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
HONORABLE JAMES D. PETERSON, United States Chief Judge.
Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the parties' joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, hereby enters a judgment under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) reversing the Commissioner's decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991).
On remand, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) will proceed through the sequential disability evaluation process as appropriate, offer Plaintiff a new hearing, and issue a new decision. If warranted, the ALJ will obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony.
SO ORDERED.