From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Albrecht v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2012
CASE NO.: 2:10-CV-03236-GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 2:10-CV-03236-GGH

01-09-2012

THOMAS ALBRECHT, Plaintiff, v. BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS, INC., BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONSJXC, BRIDGESTONE RET AIL OPERATIONS, LLC, BFS RETAIL & COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS LLC, FIRESTONE TIRE CO., FIRESTONE RUBBER, FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE CENTERS, and DOES 1 to 20, Inclusive, Defendants.

Arnold D. Larson, Esq., CSB No. 77118 Mary P. LARSON, GARRICK & LIGHTFOOT, LLP Attorneys For Defendants BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS, INC.; BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONS, LLC; and BRIDGESTONE RETAIL OPERATIONS, LLC


Arnold D. Larson, Esq., CSB No. 77118

Mary P. Lightfoot, Esq., CSB No. 137477

LARSON, GARRICK & LIGHTFOOT, LLP

Attorneys For Defendants BRIDGESTONE

AMERICAS, INC.; BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS

TIRE OPERATIONS, LLC; and BRIDGESTONE

RETAIL OPERATIONS, LLC

[Hon. Gregory G. Hollows]


(Removed from Solano County Superior Court, Case No. FCS 036269; The Hon.

Ramona J. Garrett, presiding, Dept 09)


STIPULATION [AND ORDER] FOR

DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(ii)

Defendants BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS, INC., BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONS, LLC and BRIDGESTONE RETAIL OPERATIONS, LLC (herein collectively, "DEFENDANTS") and Plaintiff

THOMAS ALBRECHT ("Plaintiff"), being all the parties to this action, enter into the following stipulation:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties hereto, by and through their respective counsel of record, that pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) & (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-referenced action shall be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice.

LARSON, GARRICK & LIGHTFOOT, LLP

By: ____________

MARY P. LIGHTFOOT

Attorneys fore Defendants,

BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS, INC.,

BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE

OPERATIONS, LLC and BRIDGESTONE

RETAIL OPERATIONS, LLC

LAW OFFICE OF R. NICHOLAS HANEY

By: ____________

R. NICHOLAS HANEY

Attorneys for Plaintiff.

THOMAS ALBRECHT

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint of Plaintiff THOMAS ALBRECHT, be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice.

____________

JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT


Summaries of

Albrecht v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2012
CASE NO.: 2:10-CV-03236-GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Albrecht v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS ALBRECHT, Plaintiff, v. BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS, INC., BRIDGESTONE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 9, 2012

Citations

CASE NO.: 2:10-CV-03236-GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)