Opinion
February 14, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Wright, J.).
The record shows that the petitioner repeatedly ignored questions posed to him by a supervisor and intentionally refused to follow two separate orders to report to that supervisor's office. Accordingly, the respondent Commission's affirming the Parks Commissioner's adoption of the ALJ's recommendations as to findings and penalty was not arbitrary as a matter of law (see, Matter of New York City Dept. of Envtl. Protection v New York City Civ. Serv. Commn., 164 A.D.2d 834, 835-836).
The petitioner's remaining arguments are without merit.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Milonas, Ellerin, Ross and Rubin, JJ.