From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alberty v. Greensboro

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1941
14 S.E.2d 635 (N.C. 1941)

Opinion

(Filed 21 May, 1941.)

Municipal Corporations § 14 —

Nonsuit held proper in this action to recover for death of intestate, who was killed when he failed to discover and take a curve in the street, but drove straight on into a ditch and trees growing near an old abandoned road.

APPEAL by plaintiff from Pless, Jr., J., at 3 February Term, 1941, of GUILFORD. Affirmed.

Harry R. Stanley for plaintiff, appellant.

Andrew Joyner, Jr., and H. C. Wilson for defendant, appellee.


Plaintiff's action is for damages against the city of Greensboro for alleged negligence in failing to keep a portion of Randolph Avenue safe for travel. At the place the injury occurred there is a decided curve in the street, and straight ahead, in the direct line of travel, there is a disused road, formerly a part of the main way. This old road is not barricaded from the street, and the allegation is that the street was not sufficiently lighted at that point to enable the deceased to discover the surroundings. There was a slight declivity, a ditch, and trees growing near the old road which it is alleged were a source of danger, and the whole situation is alleged to be of such a character as to lure deceased into a trap.

Driving down this street with some companions late at night, deceased failed to take the curve, drove off the highway, and was killed.

We agree with the court below that there is no evidence to sustain a verdict for the plaintiff and the judgment as of nonsuit was proper.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Alberty v. Greensboro

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1941
14 S.E.2d 635 (N.C. 1941)
Case details for

Alberty v. Greensboro

Case Details

Full title:JAMES I. ALBERTY, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF CHESTER ALBERTY…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 1, 1941

Citations

14 S.E.2d 635 (N.C. 1941)
219 N.C. 649

Citing Cases

Ledford v. Winston-Salem

The essential and operative facts of the two cases are strikingly similar, except that in the Dillon Case…