From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alberts v. EEOC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 18, 2019
Case No. 3:19-cv-177-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Nov. 18, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 3:19-cv-177-KRG-KAP

11-18-2019

RICHARD P. ALBERTS, Plaintiff v. EEOC, Defendant


Memorandum Order

This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.§ 636 and Local Civil Rule 72.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on October 23, 2019, ECF no. 4, recommending that the complaint be dismissed without leave to amend.

The plaintiff was notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1), he had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired.

After review of the record of this matter and the Report and Recommendation under the "reasoned consideration" standard, see EEOC v. City of Long Branch, 866 F.3d 93, 100 (3d Cir.2017)(standard of review when no timely and specific objections are filed), the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2019, it is

ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed as recommended in the Report and Recommendation at ECF no. 4, which is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

KIM R. GIBSON,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Notice by U.S. Mail to:

Richard P. Alberts

2311 Seventh Avenue

Altoona, PA 16602


Summaries of

Alberts v. EEOC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 18, 2019
Case No. 3:19-cv-177-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Nov. 18, 2019)
Case details for

Alberts v. EEOC

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD P. ALBERTS, Plaintiff v. EEOC, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 18, 2019

Citations

Case No. 3:19-cv-177-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Nov. 18, 2019)