From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Albert Yum v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 2, 2024
8:23-cv-01786-JWH-DFM (C.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2024)

Opinion

8:23-cv-01786-JWH-DFM

01-02-2024

ALBERT YUM, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendant.


JUDGMENT

JOHN W. HOLCOMB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Pursuant to the “Hearing Re: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 11]; Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [ECF No. 18],” and in accordance with Rules 12(b)(6) and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:

1. This Court possesses subject matter jurisdiction over the above captioned action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
2. The operative pleading is the “Claim and ORDER to Go to Small Claims Court,” which the Court has liberally construed as a Complaint.
3. Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. shall have JUDGMENT in its FAVOR, and AGAINST Plaintiff Albert Yum. Plaintiff Albert Yum shall take nothing by way of his Complaint. This action is DISMISSED.
4. Other than potential post-judgment remedies (including those provided in Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), to the extent that any party requests any other form of relief, such request is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Albert Yum v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 2, 2024
8:23-cv-01786-JWH-DFM (C.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Albert Yum v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT YUM, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 2, 2024

Citations

8:23-cv-01786-JWH-DFM (C.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2024)