From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Albert v. Sheeley's Drug Store, Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jan 25, 2021
243 A.3d 1293 (Pa. 2021)

Opinion

No. 416 MAL 2020

01-25-2021

Dale E. ALBERT Individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of Cody M. Albert, Deceased, Petitioner v. SHEELEY'S DRUG STORE, INC. and Zachary Ross, Respondents


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:

(1) Did the Superior Court err in finding that Plaintiff's claim was barred under the in pari delicto doctrine, where there is no evidence in the record that the decedent participated in the scheme to procure the prescription drugs illegally?
(2) Did the Superior Court improperly expand the doctrine of in pari delicto to preclude Plaintiff's recovery simply because Decedent was in possession of a controlled substance that was not his?


Summaries of

Albert v. Sheeley's Drug Store, Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jan 25, 2021
243 A.3d 1293 (Pa. 2021)
Case details for

Albert v. Sheeley's Drug Store, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DALE E. ALBERT INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF CODY…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 25, 2021

Citations

243 A.3d 1293 (Pa. 2021)