From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Albert v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 21, 2019
240 N.J. 1 (N.J. 2019)

Opinion

C-225 September Term 2019 083260

10-21-2019

Edna ALBERT and Schmuel Albert, her husband, Plaintiffs-Petitioners, v. PATHMARK STORES, INC., and Klingensmith Associates, LLC, Defendants, and Michael C. DiStefano, M.D., Charles F. Asta, M.D., the Valley Hospital, and Malwinder Singh, M.D., Defendants.


ORDER

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-005163-17 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.


Summaries of

Albert v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 21, 2019
240 N.J. 1 (N.J. 2019)
Case details for

Albert v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Edna ALBERT and Schmuel Albert, her husband, Plaintiffs-Petitioners, v…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Oct 21, 2019

Citations

240 N.J. 1 (N.J. 2019)
219 A.3d 155