Albert Mojonnier, Inc. v. Ind. Com

1 Citing case

  1. Board v. Industrial Com

    472 N.E.2d 105 (Ill. App. Ct. 1984)   Cited 4 times

    Bennett argued in the circuit court and contends here that he is a party in interest and, because he was not named in the praecipe, the circuit court never acquired jurisdiction. Relying on the decisions in Albert Mojonnier, Inc. v. Industrial Com. (1968), 41 Ill.2d 128, 242 N.E.2d 184 ( Mojonnier I), and Albert Mojonnier, Inc. v. Industrial Com. (1969), 42 Ill.2d 182, 246 N.E.2d 243 ( Mojonnier II), the circuit court concluded that Bennett was not a party in interest. In Mojonnier I, an employee of Manpower, Inc., was injured while working for Mojonnier. After the arbitrator found that Mojonnier was a borrowing employer, Mojonnier sought review, naming only the claimant.