From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Albers v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Jul 19, 2011
Civ. No. 11-092 WPJ/KBM (D.N.M. Jul. 19, 2011)

Opinion

Civ. No. 11-092 WPJ/KBM.

July 19, 2011


ORDER


THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant's timely-filed objections [Doc. 24] to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 23]. The Court has reviewed the parties' submissions, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto and finds that the objections are not well-taken and that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation shall be adopted by the Court.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Lieu of Response/Answer [Doc. 16] is denied;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall have ten (10) days to file his Response/Answer to the Petition for Writ of Mandamus [Doc. 1].

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Albers v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Jul 19, 2011
Civ. No. 11-092 WPJ/KBM (D.N.M. Jul. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Albers v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD ALBERS and TAMMY M. NUNLEY, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE…

Court:United States District Court, D. New Mexico

Date published: Jul 19, 2011

Citations

Civ. No. 11-092 WPJ/KBM (D.N.M. Jul. 19, 2011)