From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Albany Brewing Co. v. Barckley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1902
70 App. Div. 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)

Opinion

March Term, 1902.

George H. Mallory, for the appellant.

Robert W. Hardie, for the respondent.



This judgment must be reversed as beyond the power of the County Court to grant. The jurisdiction of that court is prescribed by statute. There is no statutory authority for a trial by the County Court of the issue which was here tried between the plaintiff and the defendant Smith, nor for the granting of any judgment upon such an issue. This want of jurisdiction is not cured by any proceeding on the part of the defendant Smith, as a defendant is powerless, even by consent, to confer jurisdiction of the subject-matter in litigation upon a court of limited jurisdiction. It becomes unnecessary, therefore, to examine the other objections discussed upon the briefs of counsel. The judgment must be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event of the action.

All concurred.

Judgment reversed on the law and facts and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event.


Summaries of

Albany Brewing Co. v. Barckley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1902
70 App. Div. 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)
Case details for

Albany Brewing Co. v. Barckley

Case Details

Full title:ALBANY BREWING COMPANY, Respondent, v . EDWARD L. BARCKLEY, as Treasurer…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1902

Citations

70 App. Div. 260 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)
74 N.Y.S. 901

Citing Cases

Tierney v. Helvetia Swiss Fire Insurance Co.

It is contended that by appearance in the Supreme Court and opposing the defendant's motion to vacate the…