From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alani v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 5, 2011
Case No.CV-10-2766 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.CV-10-2766 WHA

10-05-2011

ABDUL ALANI, Plaintiff, v. ALASKA AIRLINES, INC.; CORPORATE DOES 1-20; and INDIVIDUAL DOES 21-40, inclusive, Defendants.

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Stuart W. Miller Attorneys for Defendant ALASKA AIRLINES, INC. DEBORAH C. ENGLAND, ATTORNEY AT LAW Deborah C. England Attorneys for Plaintiff ABDUL ALANI


Deborah C. England (CSB 122424)
Attorney At Law
Attorney for Plaintiff
ABDUL ALAN1
Michael Reiss (CSB 48527)
Stuart W. Miller (CSB 127766)
Angela M. Corridan (CSB 257076)
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
ALASKA AIRLINES, INC.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REQUESTING THE COURT WITHDRAW SEPTEMBER 29, 2011 ORDER

WHEREAS, on September 29, 2011, the Court signed an Order ("September 29, 2011 Order") requiring Defendant to produce "Aviation Safety Action Program" ("ASAP") reports submitted by technicians employed by Defendant at either San Francisco International Airport or Oakland International Airport, who have submitted three or more ASAP reports, whether accepted or rejected by the ASAP committee, during the period January 1, 2007, through August 31,2008.

WHEREAS, the September 29, 2011 Order further stated that the name of a technician submitting any ASAP report to be produced shall be redacted and replaced by a unique numeric code assigned to the individual technician and that such documents may be produced by Defendant subject to the stipulated Protective Order entered in this action.

WHEREAS, the September 29, 2011 Order further stated that the documents to be produced shall be served on Plaintiff's counsel not later than October 11, 201, and that Defendant shall have one week from the date of the hearing on that matter to submit a letter on behalf of the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") and/or the Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Organization ("AMFA"), respectively, if either entity objects to the disclosure of the redacted documents, requesting to be heard to object to the September 29, 2011 Order.

WHEREAS, the parties have reached an agreement concerning the ASAP reports subject to the Court's September 29, 2011 Order that does not require Defendants to produce ASAP reports.

THEREFORE, the parties stipulate to the request that the Court withdraw and remove from court records the September 29, 2011 Order; or, in the alternative, that this Stipulation and [Proponed] Order will replace and supersede the September 29, 2011 Order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD,

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

Stuart W. Miller

Attorneys for Defendant

ALASKA AIRLINES, INC.

DEBORAH C. ENGLAND,

ATTORNEY AT LAW

Deborah C. England

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ABDUL ALANI

This stipulation and order will replace and supersede the order dated September 29, 2011 (Dkt. No. 50). PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

William Alsup

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

I, Angela M. Corridan, attest that I obtained the concurrence of Deborah C. England, in filing this document.

I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 3rd day of October, 2011, at San Francisco, California.

Angela M. Corridan


Summaries of

Alani v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 5, 2011
Case No.CV-10-2766 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Alani v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ABDUL ALANI, Plaintiff, v. ALASKA AIRLINES, INC.; CORPORATE DOES 1-20; and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

Case No.CV-10-2766 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)