From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alana v. Clarke

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 23, 2019
No. 18-7329 (4th Cir. Dec. 23, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-7329

12-23-2019

METKEL ALANA, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir. of Va. DOC, Respondent - Appellee.

Metkel Alana, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:18-cv-00205-RAJ-RJK) Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Metkel Alana, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Metkel Alana seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss Alana's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition as successive and unauthorized. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012); Jones v. Braxton, 392 F.3d 683, 688 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Alana has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Alana v. Clarke

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 23, 2019
No. 18-7329 (4th Cir. Dec. 23, 2019)
Case details for

Alana v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:METKEL ALANA, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir. of Va…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 23, 2019

Citations

No. 18-7329 (4th Cir. Dec. 23, 2019)