Opinion
Nos. 05-04-01528-CR, 05-04-01529-CR
Opinion Filed October 11, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F02-50606-WM, F02-50605-WM. Affirm.
Before Justices FITZGERALD, LANG-MIERS, and MAZZANT.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Juan Alamillo pleaded guilty to two aggravated robbery offenses. Pursuant to the plea bargain agreements, the trial judge deferred adjudicating guilt, placed appellant on ten years' community supervision, and assessed a $2000 fine in each case. The State later moved to adjudicate guilt, alleging appellant violated several conditions of supervision. Following a hearing, the trial judge adjudicated appellant guilty and sentenced him to seventy-five years' imprisonment in each case. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response, but appellant did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals. We affirm the trial court's judgments.