From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alameda v. Schvartz

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Nov 10, 2021
4:21-cv-0921-P (N.D. Tex. Nov. 10, 2021)

Opinion

4:21-cv-0921-P

11-10-2021

Dustin M. Alameda et al., Plaintiffs, v. Sam Shvartz et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES

MARK T. PITTMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On October 19, 2021, the United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (“FCR”) in this case. ECF No. 20. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is now ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge concludes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Amended Motion for Nonsuit (ECF No. 19). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs' claims against Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Alameda v. Schvartz

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Nov 10, 2021
4:21-cv-0921-P (N.D. Tex. Nov. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Alameda v. Schvartz

Case Details

Full title:Dustin M. Alameda et al., Plaintiffs, v. Sam Shvartz et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Nov 10, 2021

Citations

4:21-cv-0921-P (N.D. Tex. Nov. 10, 2021)