From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alakozai v. Chase Inv. Servs. Corp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 7, 2014
557 F. App'x 658 (9th Cir. 2014)

Summary

holding that the arbitration agreement incorporated FINRA rules, thereby excluding class claims from arbitration

Summary of this case from Zoller v. UBS Sec. LLC

Opinion

No. 12-55553 D.C. No. 2:11-cv-09178-SJO-JEM

02-07-2014

MICHAEL ALAKOZAI and STEVEN PITTS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. CHASE INVESTMENT SERVICES CORP., Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding


Submitted February 5, 2014

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
--------

Pasadena, California

Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Chase Investment Services Corporation appeals the district court's denial of its motion to compel arbitration of plaintiffs' class action claims. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 16 and affirm.

The district court did not err by denying Chase's motion to compel arbitration. The Federal Arbitration Act ensures that private arbitration agreements "are enforced according to their terms." Momot v. Mastro, 652 F.3d 982, 986 (9th Cir. 2011) (quoting Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int'l Corp., 559 U.S. 662, 682 (2010). We apply contractual interpretation rules, and the intention of the parties controls. Id. The plain language of the arbitration agreement incorporates Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Rules and requires arbitration of individual claims, but excludes class claims from arbitration. The agreement contains no waiver of plaintiffs' rights to bring class action claims against Chase. It merely provides that class claims cannot be arbitrated by FINRA. Because the district court has not yet addressed class certification in this case, FINRA Rule 13204(d) precludes enforcement of the arbitration agreement at this time.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Alakozai v. Chase Inv. Servs. Corp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 7, 2014
557 F. App'x 658 (9th Cir. 2014)

holding that the arbitration agreement incorporated FINRA rules, thereby excluding class claims from arbitration

Summary of this case from Zoller v. UBS Sec. LLC
Case details for

Alakozai v. Chase Inv. Servs. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ALAKOZAI and STEVEN PITTS, individually and on behalf of all…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 7, 2014

Citations

557 F. App'x 658 (9th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Zoller v. UBS Sec. LLC

In other words, FINRA Rule 13204 is effectively part of the parties' arbitration agreement. See Lloyd v. J.P.…

Lloyd v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.

We agree. We decline plaintiffs' invitation to accord collateral estoppel effect to the Ninth Circuit's…