Opinion
No. 1D21-2708
05-16-2022
A.L., Father of S.L. and V.L., Minor Children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
Samuel T. Lea of the Law Office of Samuel T. Lea, Orlando, for Appellant. Ward L. Metzger of Children's Legal Services, Tallahassee, for Appellee Department of Children and Families. Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Amanda Victoria Glass, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem o/b/o S.L. and V.L.
Samuel T. Lea of the Law Office of Samuel T. Lea, Orlando, for Appellant.
Ward L. Metzger of Children's Legal Services, Tallahassee, for Appellee Department of Children and Families.
Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Amanda Victoria Glass, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem o/b/o S.L. and V.L.
Per Curiam.
Considering the evidence presented at the adjudicatory hearing "from a perspective favorable to sustaining dependency," T.H. v. Florida Department of Children and Families , 308 So. 3d 678, 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020), competent, substantial evidence supported the trial court's order adjudicating S.L. and V.L. dependent. There was sufficient evidence of an ongoing environment of domestic violence at Appellant's home that endangered S.L. and V.L., along with ongoing substance abuse. Despite being given the opportunity to do so, Appellant had not sufficiently remedied those issues. Under the definitions provided in section 39.01, S.L. and V.L. are abused and neglected children and so were properly found to be dependent. § 39.01(15)(a), Fla. Stat. (2020). We reject Appellant's argument to the contrary.
AFFIRMED .
Lewis, Tanenbaum, and Long, JJ., concur.