From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Al-Marri v. Bush

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Mar 7, 2005
Civil Action No. 04-2035 (GK) (D.D.C. Mar. 7, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-2035 (GK).

March 7, 2005


ORDER


On January 10, 2005, Petitioners filed a Motion for Discovery and for Preservation Order. Petitioners request that the Court order Respondents to preserve and maintain all evidence and information regarding the torture, mistreatment, and abuse of detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Respondents, however, argue that Petitioners have failed to satisfy the standard for entering a preliminary injunction, which is required when considering a request for a preservation order.

"[A] document preservation order is no more an injunction than an order requiring a party to identify witnesses or to produce documents in discovery." Pueblo of Laguna v. United States, 60 Fed. Cl. 133, 138 n. 8 (Fed.Cl. 2004) (citing Mercer v. Magnant, 40 F.3d 893, 896 (7th Cir. 1994)). Thus, Petitioners need not meet such a standard when seeking a preservation order. Furthermore, Respondents represent that the information at issue will not be destroyed, so the Court finds that entering a preservation order will inflict no harm or prejudice upon them. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that Petitioners' Motion for Preservation Order is granted; it is further

ORDERED that Respondents shall preserve and maintain all evidence and information regarding the torture, mistreatment, and abuse of detainees now at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility.


Summaries of

Al-Marri v. Bush

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Mar 7, 2005
Civil Action No. 04-2035 (GK) (D.D.C. Mar. 7, 2005)
Case details for

Al-Marri v. Bush

Case Details

Full title:JARALLAH AL-MARRI, et al., Petitioners, v. GEORGE W. BUSH, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Mar 7, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-2035 (GK) (D.D.C. Mar. 7, 2005)

Citing Cases

El-Banna v. Bush

Respondents' contrary view of the requested order (Opp'n at 7) may underscore the need for a preservation…

Abdah v. Bush

Finally, because respondents represent that they will not destroy the information at issue, a preservation…