From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Al-Hakim v. Publix Supermarkets

Supreme Court of the United States
Dec 3, 2007
552 U.S. 1059 (2007)

Opinion

No. 07–6768.

2007-12-3

Marzuq AL–HAKIM, petitioner, v. PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS.


Case below, 965 So.2d 130.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam).

*713 Justice STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S.Ct. 397 and cases cited therein.


Summaries of

Al-Hakim v. Publix Supermarkets

Supreme Court of the United States
Dec 3, 2007
552 U.S. 1059 (2007)
Case details for

Al-Hakim v. Publix Supermarkets

Case Details

Full title:Marzuq AL–HAKIM, petitioner, v. PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Dec 3, 2007

Citations

552 U.S. 1059 (2007)
128 S. Ct. 712
169 L. Ed. 2d 550
76 U.S.L.W. 3288

Citing Cases

Rolle v. Perry

Id. at 184, 109 S.Ct. 993. Importantly, the McDonald Court made this decision after analyzing section 1915(a)…

Rolle v. Dilmore

Id. at 184, 109 S.Ct. 993. Importantly, the McDonald Court made this decision after analyzing section 1915(a)…