From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Akl v. Swersky

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 26, 2007
231 F. App'x 231 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-1017.

Submitted: June 21, 2007.

Decided: June 26, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00964-LMB).

Ziad Akl, Appellant Pro Se. James Van Ingold, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia; Jack McKay, Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw Pittman, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Ziad Akl appeals the district court's orders granting the Defendants' motion to dismiss this civil action, and denying the subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Akl v. Swersky, No. 1:06-cv00964-LMB (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 17, 2006 entered Nov. 20, 2006; filed Dec. 22, 2006 entered Dec. 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Akl v. Swersky

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 26, 2007
231 F. App'x 231 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Akl v. Swersky

Case Details

Full title:Ziad AKL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alfred D. SWERSKY; Sarah Haley; Deborah…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 26, 2007

Citations

231 F. App'x 231 (4th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Holland

Thomas again appealed. On March 7, 2008, the Fourth Circuit dismissed the appeal and refused to issue a…

Akl v. Swersky

Ziad AKL, petitioner, v. Alfred D. SWERSKY, et al.Case below, 231 Fed.Appx. 231. Petition for writ of…