From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Akinro v. Hertz Car Rental

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 1, 2010
395 F. App'x 1002 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-1707.

Submitted: September 28, 2010.

Decided: October 1, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01297-JFM).

Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Francis Akinro appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. Hertz Car Rental, No. 1:10-cv-01297-JFM (D. Md. June 4, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Akinro v. Hertz Car Rental

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 1, 2010
395 F. App'x 1002 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Akinro v. Hertz Car Rental

Case Details

Full title:Francis AKINRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HERTZ CAR RENTAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 1, 2010

Citations

395 F. App'x 1002 (4th Cir. 2010)