From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

AKEY v. HAAG

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Jan 22, 2008
File No. 1:05-cv-331 (D. Vt. Jan. 22, 2008)

Opinion

File No. 1:05-cv-331.

January 22, 2008


ORDER


The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed December 20, 2007 (Paper 50). After de novo review and absent objection, the Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Paper 49) is DENIED.

This matter is returned to Magistrate Judge Niedermeier for further proceedings.

It is further certified that any appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith because such an appeal would be frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

AKEY v. HAAG

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Jan 22, 2008
File No. 1:05-cv-331 (D. Vt. Jan. 22, 2008)
Case details for

AKEY v. HAAG

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL G. AKEY, Plaintiff v. KAREN HAAG and SAMANTHA CLARK, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Vermont

Date published: Jan 22, 2008

Citations

File No. 1:05-cv-331 (D. Vt. Jan. 22, 2008)