Opinion
2:07-CV-00572-JCM-GWF
08-26-2011
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JAMES KESZEI, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
Presently before the court is plaintiff Montgomery Carl Akers' motion for magistrate judge to reconsider order on legal call with counsel. (Doc. #298). Defendants have not filed an opposition.
Though captioned as a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order regarding a legal call with counsel, the motion requests a temporary restraining order. Plaintiff, however, already moved this court for a temporary restraining order by separate motion (doc. #297) the same day the instant motion was filed. The court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order (doc. #300), and plaintiff has lodged an appeal of that decision with the Ninth Circuit (doc. #303). Accordingly, the present motion seeking a temporary restraining order is moot.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff's motion for magistrate judge to reconsider order on legal call with counsel (doc. #298) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.
__________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE