Akers v. Diguglielmo

Full title: MARVIN LEE AKERS, Petitioner v. SUPERINTENDENT DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, et al.…

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 27, 2009

Civil Action No. 08-1686 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 27, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-1686.

April 27, 2009

ORDER

DAVID CERCONE, District Judge

AND NOW, this 27^th day of April, 2009, after the Petitioner, Marvin Lee Akers, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties until April 17, 2009, to file written objections thereto, and Petitioner's copies of the Report and Recommendation having been returned by his last two known addresses (SCI Graterford and Renewal Center) and no objections having been filed by Respondents, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Dkt. 1] is dismissed for failure to prosecute.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.