From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Akamai Technologies v. Limelight Networks

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Sep 20, 2011
Nos. 2009-1372, -1380, -1416, -1417, 2010-1291 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 20, 2011)

Opinion

2009-1372 2009-1380 2009-1416 2009-1417 2010-1291

09-20-2011

AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, and THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant. MCKESSON TECHNOLOGIES INC. (FORMERLY MCKESSON INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, LLC), Plaintiff-Appellant v. EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION Defendant-Appellee.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in case nos. 06-CV-11109 and 06-CV-11585, Judge Rya W. Zobel.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in case no. 06-CV-2965, Chief Judge Jack T. Camp

ON MOTION


ORDER

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Oral argument for these appeals is scheduled for November 18, 2011, in Courtroom 201. Each side will have 30 minutes for oral argument.

(2) The oral argument for Appeal No. 2009-1372 will be heard at 2 p.m. Appeal No. 2010-1291 will be heard at 3 p.m.

(3) Counsel for the parties shall notify the clerk, in writing, by October 21, 2011, of the names of the counsel who will present the oral argument.

FOR THE COURT

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc: Donald R. Dunner, Esq.

Robert S. Frank, Jr., Esq.

Aaron M. Panner, Esq.

Daryl L. Joseffer, Esq.

William H. Boice, Esq.

Amici Curiae Counsel


Summaries of

Akamai Technologies v. Limelight Networks

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Sep 20, 2011
Nos. 2009-1372, -1380, -1416, -1417, 2010-1291 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Akamai Technologies v. Limelight Networks

Case Details

Full title:AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, and THE MASSACHUSETTS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Sep 20, 2011

Citations

Nos. 2009-1372, -1380, -1416, -1417, 2010-1291 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 20, 2011)