AJUZ v. MUKASEY

1 Citing case

  1. Reis v. McCleary

    200 F. Supp. 3d 291 (D. Mass. 2016)   Cited 3 times

    The plaintiff relies on Ajuz v. Mukasey for the proposition that he does not lack good moral character simply because he misunderstood USCIS's questions and answered them incorrectly under oath. See No. 07–MC–0185, 2009 WL 902369, at *4 (E.D.Pa. Apr. 2, 2009) ("[F]alse testimony due to a misunderstanding, a misinterpretation, or an innocent mistake is insufficient to deny citizenship for lack of good moral character." (quoting Saad v. Barrows, No. CIV.A. 3:03–CV–1342G, 2004 WL 1359165, at *6 (N.D.Tex. June 16, 2004) )).