From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A.J. Armstrong Co., Inc. v. Nechamkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 2, 1976
55 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

December 2, 1976


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered August 31, 1976, which, inter alia, granted the motion of the plaintiff to strike the jury demand of the defendant and third-party plaintiff Ruth Nechamkin, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Ruth Nechamkin had executed a guarantee in favor of A.J. Armstrong Co., Inc., to induce it to make a loan to a corporation known as Olim Sales Corp. The guarantee contained a waiver of "all right to a jury trial in any action against the undersigned [guarantor]." A jury waiver clause in a guarantee is enforceable (James Talcott, Inc. v Wilson Hosiery Co., 32 A.D.2d 524; Bonnie-Lassie Sportswear v Century Factors, 283 App. Div. 702), and the defendant and third-party plaintiff has offered no adequate reason to deny enforcement of the waiver in the case at bar.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Markewich, Kupferman, Silverman and Lane, JJ.


Summaries of

A.J. Armstrong Co., Inc. v. Nechamkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 2, 1976
55 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

A.J. Armstrong Co., Inc. v. Nechamkin

Case Details

Full title:A.J. ARMSTRONG CO., INC., Respondent, v. RUTH NECHAMKIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 2, 1976

Citations

55 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Mercury Partners LLC v. Pacific Medical Buildings, L.P.

Such waivers are valid and enforceable, unless adequate basis to deny enforcement is set forth by the…

Fordham Univ. v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust

Such waivers are valid and enforceable, unless adequate basis to deny enforcement is set forth by the…