From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aitken v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 30, 2013
Case No. CV 13-3631 R (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2013)

Summary

denying motion to modify condition of release filed while petitioner still in custody

Summary of this case from Fritch v. United States

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-3631 R (MRW)

08-30-2013

JOHN AITKEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

________________

HON. MANUEL L. REAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Aitken v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 30, 2013
Case No. CV 13-3631 R (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2013)

denying motion to modify condition of release filed while petitioner still in custody

Summary of this case from Fritch v. United States
Case details for

Aitken v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JOHN AITKEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 30, 2013

Citations

Case No. CV 13-3631 R (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2013)

Citing Cases

Fritch v. United States

However, generally, challenges to conditions of release are premature if they are brought prior to the…

Aitken v. United States

Additionally, the Court notes that it previously denied relief to Petitioner in another habeas action…