From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Airtran Airways v. City of Chicago

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois
Jan 21, 2004
03 C 4685 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 21, 2004)

Opinion

03 C 4685

January 21, 2004


Defendant City of Chicago has moved to strike allegations 11, 12, 13, and 16 of Plaintiff Airtran Airways, Inc.'s Complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f).

The motion to strike allegation 11 is granted because the allegation is compound. Airtran is ordered to re-plead as 11a, 11b, etc. The motion to strike allegation 12 is granted.

The motion to strike allegation 13 is granted in the same respect as it was to allegations 11 and 12.

The motion to strike allegation 16 is denied.

For the reasons above, the City's Motion to Strike Allegations 11, 12, 13 and 16 is GRANTED as to allegations 11, 12 and 13 but DENIED as to allegation 16.


Summaries of

Airtran Airways v. City of Chicago

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois
Jan 21, 2004
03 C 4685 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 21, 2004)
Case details for

Airtran Airways v. City of Chicago

Case Details

Full title:Airtran Airways v. City of Chicago

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois

Date published: Jan 21, 2004

Citations

03 C 4685 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 21, 2004)