From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Airlines Reporting Corp. v. Protravel, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 15, 1997
239 A.D.2d 233 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 15, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.).


Plaintiff is in the business of accrediting travel agents in the United States for the sale of world wide air transportation tickets and ancillary travel services. Its program is accomplished through a computerized system known as the Agent's Standard Ticket and Area Settlement Plan. Pursuant to this Plan, travel agents enter into a formal Agent Reporting Agreement whereby plaintiff, authorized under separate agreement with commercial air carriers, furnishes the agents with blank accountable standard forms to be issued as airline tickets and other travel instruments. In exchange, the agents report their sales and remit all proceeds to plaintiff on a weekly basis.

The instant action is against one such travel agency for failure to account for the sale of some $250,000 worth of tickets, alleging breach of contract, unjust enrichment, conversion, breach of fiduciary obligation, negligent failure to supervise employees, and fraud.

A contracting party generally has a right to maintain an action in its own name (CPLR 1004). Plaintiff was not some stranger whose only connection to these transactions was by power of attorney ( cf:, Spencer v. Standard Chems. Metals Corp., 237 N.Y. 479). Notwithstanding its status as a clearinghouse for the airlines, plaintiff had independent authority and its own beneficial interest in this business ( see, Watts v. Phillips-Jones Corp., 211 App. Div. 523, affd 242 N.Y. 557). Plaintiff's agreement with the carriers permitted such independence of operation, and defendant, by signing onto the Plan, agreed to conduct all its business with respect to those carriers exclusively through plaintiff ( see, Jarach v. Ocean Carriers Corp., 9 A.D.2d 646).

In short, plaintiff is a "real party in interest," entitled to maintain this action in its own name ( Airlines Reporting Corp. v S N Travel, 238 A.D.2d 292, 293; see also, Airlines Reporting Corp. v. S N Travel, 58 F.3d 857, 861, n 4).

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Airlines Reporting Corp. v. Protravel, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 15, 1997
239 A.D.2d 233 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Airlines Reporting Corp. v. Protravel, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AIRLINES REPORTING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. PROTRAVEL, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 15, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 233 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 654

Citing Cases

Airlines Reporting Corporation v. Belfon

It is telling that the two cases on which Defendant places his utmost reliance — Airlines Reporting Corp v. S…

Schlackman v. Robin S. Weingast Associates

In addition, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the motion of Mass Mutual which was pursuant…