From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Airborne Am., Inc. v. Kenway Composites

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Feb 7, 2022
20-CV-2208 JLS (BLM) (S.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2022)

Opinion

20-CV-2208 JLS (BLM)

02-07-2022

AIRBORNE AMERICA, INC., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. KENWAY COMPOSITES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER (1) GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT DETERMINATION (2) DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT; AND (3) DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE (ECF Nos. 31, 43)

Hon. Janis L. Sammartino United States District Judge

Presently before the Court is the Parties' Joint Motion of All Parties for Order Determining Good Faith Settlement and for Entry of Dismissal with Prejudice (ECF No. 43). Good cause appearing and there being no opposition, the Court hereby finds the settlement between the Parties was made in good faith pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure sections 877 and 877.6, and the factors outlined in Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & Associates, 38 Cal.3d 488 (1985). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Joint Motion. As agreed by the Parties and pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 877.6(c), the Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this action in its entirety. Each Party shall bear its own costs.

In light of the Parties' settlement, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Defendant Hill & Smith Holdings, PLC's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 31). The Clerk of the Court shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Airborne Am., Inc. v. Kenway Composites

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Feb 7, 2022
20-CV-2208 JLS (BLM) (S.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Airborne Am., Inc. v. Kenway Composites

Case Details

Full title:AIRBORNE AMERICA, INC., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. KENWAY…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Feb 7, 2022

Citations

20-CV-2208 JLS (BLM) (S.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2022)