From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A.I.M.G., LLC v. ERA Funding Grp., LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 21, 2018
159 A.D.3d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

2016–09608 Index No. 4840/16

03-21-2018

A.I.M.G., LLC, appellant, v. ERA FUNDING GROUP, LLC, respondent, et al., defendants.

David Morisset, P.C., Brooklyn, NY, for appellant.


David Morisset, P.C., Brooklyn, NY, for appellant.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., JEFFREY A. COHEN, HECTOR D. LASALLE, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff has an ownership interest in certain real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Wade, J.), dated September 9, 2016, which denied, as academic, its motion to stay the execution of a certain warrant of eviction.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

It is undisputed that the defendant ERA Funding Group, LLC, as the record owner of certain premises located in Brooklyn, commenced a landlord-tenant proceeding in the Civil Court, Kings County, against the plaintiff's sole member, who resided there. The parties to that proceeding entered into a stipulation, wherein the alleged tenant consented to the jurisdiction of the Civil Court and to a final judgment of possession. Thereafter, the plaintiff commenced this action, asserting causes of action sounding in, inter alia, unjust enrichment and breach of a constructive trust, and seeking a judgment declaring that the plaintiff has an ownership interest in the premises. At the time this action was commenced, the plaintiff moved to stay the execution of a warrant of eviction. ERA Funding Group, LLC, opposed the motion. The Supreme Court denied the motion, stating that the eviction had been executed and, therefore, the issue was academic. The plaintiff appeals.

It is undisputed that a warrant of eviction was executed and the premises have been vacated. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied, as academic, the plaintiff's motion to stay the execution of the warrant of eviction (see Aniqa Halal Live Poultry Corp. v. Montague–Lee Ltd. Partnership, 110 A.D.3d 934, 934, 973 N.Y.S.2d 740 ; Frey v. Rose, 51 A.D.3d 859, 859 N.Y.S.2d 219 ; Blinds To Go, Inc. v. Times Plaza Dev., L.P., 19 A.D.3d 524, 797 N.Y.S.2d 529 ).

MASTRO, J.P., COHEN, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

A.I.M.G., LLC v. ERA Funding Grp., LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 21, 2018
159 A.D.3d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

A.I.M.G., LLC v. ERA Funding Grp., LLC

Case Details

Full title:A.I.M.G., LLC, appellant, v. ERA FUNDING GROUP, LLC, respondent, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 21, 2018

Citations

159 A.D.3d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
70 N.Y.S.3d 78
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 1891

Citing Cases

Carrier Commc'ns Corp. v. Mollish

, defendant's obligations in this regard are no longer in effect. Accordingly, the portion of plaintiffs…