From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aikins v. Pitre

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 30, 2018
No. 3:18-cv-2341-B (N.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2018)

Opinion

No. 3:18-cv-2341-B

10-30-2018

MIKE RAYE AIKINS, Plaintiff, v. FELICIA PITRE, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.

DATE: OCTOBER 30, 2018.

/s/ _________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Aikins v. Pitre

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 30, 2018
No. 3:18-cv-2341-B (N.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2018)
Case details for

Aikins v. Pitre

Case Details

Full title:MIKE RAYE AIKINS, Plaintiff, v. FELICIA PITRE, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 30, 2018

Citations

No. 3:18-cv-2341-B (N.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2018)

Citing Cases

Tomasella v. Div. of Child Support

H-14-2916, 2015 WL 4039388, at *4 (S.D. Tex. June 16, 2015), report and recommendation adopted as modified,…

Sullivan v. Office of the Tex. Attorney Gen.

To the contrary, when a plaintiff attempts to relitigate an adverse state-court decision by styling the…