From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aiken v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 24, 2020
Civ. No. 20-0600 (NLH) (JS) (D.N.J. Jan. 24, 2020)

Opinion

Civ. No. 20-0600 (NLH) (JS)

01-24-2020

LARRY WAYNE AIKEN, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant.

APPEARANCE: Larry Wayne Aiken 20329-017 Fort Dix Federal Correctional Institution Inmate Mail/Parcels East: P.O. Box 2000 Fort Dix, NJ 08640 Plaintiff Pro se


OPINION APPEARANCE: Larry Wayne Aiken
20329-017
Fort Dix
Federal Correctional Institution
Inmate Mail/Parcels
East: P.O. Box 2000
Fort Dix, NJ 08640

Plaintiff Pro se HILLMAN, District Judge

Plaintiff Larry Wayne Aiken, an inmate presently incarcerated at Fort Dix Federal Correctional Institution, New Jersey, seeks to bring this civil action in forma pauperis, without prepayment of fees or security, asserting a claim pursuant to the 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See ECF No. 4.

The Court administratively terminated the complaint on January 21, 2020 because Plaintiff did not submit an in forma pauperis application or the $350 filing fee. ECF No. 3. On January 23, 2020, the Court received a letter from Plaintiff requesting in forma pauperis status based on the fact that he had previously been granted in forma pauperis status in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. ECF No. 4.

The fact that Plaintiff was previously granted in forma pauperis status by another court does not automatically entitle him to in forma pauperis status in this Court for this civil action. The Prisoner Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-134, §§ 801-10, 110 Stat. 1321 (April 26, 1996) ("PLRA"), which amended 28 U.S.C. § 1915, requires prisoners who are attempting to bring a civil action in forma pauperis to submit a current financial affidavit along with a certified copy of their trust fund account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which the prisoner is or was confined. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) & (2).

The Court will deny the application without prejudice. Plaintiff may reapply by completing the financial affidavit and submitting a certified account statement.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons set forth above, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice. The Clerk will be directed to reopen the matter once Plaintiff submits a new application. An appropriate Order follows. Dated: January 24, 2020
At Camden, New Jersey

s/ Noel L. Hillman

NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Aiken v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 24, 2020
Civ. No. 20-0600 (NLH) (JS) (D.N.J. Jan. 24, 2020)
Case details for

Aiken v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

Case Details

Full title:LARRY WAYNE AIKEN, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jan 24, 2020

Citations

Civ. No. 20-0600 (NLH) (JS) (D.N.J. Jan. 24, 2020)