From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aiken v. Corrigan

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division
Oct 3, 2007
Case No. 4:07cv421-MP/WCS (N.D. Fla. Oct. 3, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 4:07cv421-MP/WCS.

October 3, 2007


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, doc. 1, and a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis, doc. 2. The complaint has been reviewed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

Plaintiff is confined at Columbia Correctional Institution in Lake City, Florida, as are all of the listed Defendants. Doc. 1. Plaintiff's claims concern the conditions of his confinement while housed at Columbia Correctional Institution. Id. Because Columbia Correctional Institution is located within the jurisdiction of the Middle District of Florida, as are the Defendants, the proper forum for this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 89(b) is in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division.

A federal district court has the authority under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) to transfer a case to another district or division "in which it could have been brought." The issue of defective venue may be raised sua sponte, and there is no need for a hearing prior to transferring this case. Lipofsky v. New York State Workers Comp. Bd., 861 F.2d 1257, 1259 (11th Cir. 1988).

In light of the foregoing, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a) and 1406(a), the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS transfer of this action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division, for all further proceedings including the decision as to whether in forma pauperis status should be granted.

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.


Summaries of

Aiken v. Corrigan

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division
Oct 3, 2007
Case No. 4:07cv421-MP/WCS (N.D. Fla. Oct. 3, 2007)
Case details for

Aiken v. Corrigan

Case Details

Full title:WARREN AIKEN, JR., Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY CORRIGAN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division

Date published: Oct 3, 2007

Citations

Case No. 4:07cv421-MP/WCS (N.D. Fla. Oct. 3, 2007)