From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aiello v. Wainewright

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Mar 16, 2022
Civil Action 2:22-CV-00018 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 16, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:22-CV-00018

03-16-2022

DANIEL AIELLO, Plaintiff, v. DALE WAINEWRIGHT, et al, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

DAVID S. MORALES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton's Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R). (D.E. 9). The M&R recommends that the Court deny Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction. Id.

The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. Plaintiff Aiello timely filed "Plaintiffs Motion of Objection to Deny Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction" on March 7, 2022. (D.E. 10).

Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the M&R, the record, the applicable law, and having made a de novo review of the portions of the M&R to which Plaintiffs objections were directed, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiffs objections. (D.E. 10).

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the following:

(1) The Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 9).

(2) The Court DENIES Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction. (D.E. 2).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Aiello v. Wainewright

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Mar 16, 2022
Civil Action 2:22-CV-00018 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Aiello v. Wainewright

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL AIELLO, Plaintiff, v. DALE WAINEWRIGHT, et al, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Mar 16, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 2:22-CV-00018 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 16, 2022)