From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aiello v. Curtin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 19, 2011
Case No. 10-14330 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 19, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 10-14330

10-19-2011

Donald James Aiello, Petitioner, v. Cindi Curtin, Respondent.


Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter has come before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Being fully advised in the premises and having reviewed the record and the pleadings, including the Report and Recommendation and any objections thereto, the Court hereby ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. It is further ordered that Petitioner's motion to hold his habeas application in abeyance is GRANTED, conditioned on Petitioner's (1) commencing state court proceedings on his unexhausted claims within 30 day of this Order, and (2) returning to this Court and seeking a lifting of the stay within 30 days of the conclusion of the state court proceedings.

SO ORDERED.

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on October 19, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Carol A. Hemeyer

Case Manager


Summaries of

Aiello v. Curtin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 19, 2011
Case No. 10-14330 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Aiello v. Curtin

Case Details

Full title:Donald James Aiello, Petitioner, v. Cindi Curtin, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 19, 2011

Citations

Case No. 10-14330 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 19, 2011)

Citing Cases

Swan v. Coupe

Several lower courts, including this one, have applied the definition set out in 28 U.S.C. § 2243: whether…