From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aidnik v. Facility

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 8, 2011
2:08-cv-02583-HDM-RAM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2011)

Opinion

2:08-cv-02583-HDM-RAM.

August 8, 2011


ORDER


The plaintiff has filed several motions with the court (#129, #130, #131). All of the motions assert claims against the prisons where plaintiff was recently and is currently being housed. These assertions are outside the scope of this action, and accordingly the plaintiff's motions for the court to order the prisons to do or refrain from doing various things and for sanctions against the prisons are hereby DENIED.

Plaintiff also asks the court to resend all documents filed in this case since April 2011. The request is granted in part, and the clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the court's order setting the settlement conference (#121). In all other respects, the request is denied as the plaintiff has already been served with these documents.

In all other respects, plaintiff's motions (#129, #130, #131) are DENIED.

Finally, the court notes that plaintiff's address has changed. The clerk of the court is directed to update plaintiff's address to the following:

Jeff Aidnik
PO Box 900
Avenal, CA 93204
Bldg 550-1-55L

Plaintiff also lists the following address:

Jeff Aidnik
PO Box 9
Avenal, CA 93204
Bldg 550-1-55L

Out of an abundance of caution, the clerk of the court is directed to send all future mailings to both addresses.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: This 5th day of August, 2011.


Summaries of

Aidnik v. Facility

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 8, 2011
2:08-cv-02583-HDM-RAM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Aidnik v. Facility

Case Details

Full title:JEFF AIDNIK, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 8, 2011

Citations

2:08-cv-02583-HDM-RAM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2011)