From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aidnik v. Facility

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 20, 2011
2:08-cv-02583-HDM-RAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2011)

Opinion

2:08-cv-02583-HDM-RAM.

April 20, 2011


ORDER


The court conducted a telephonic pretrial conference on April 20, 2011. The plaintiff was given notice of the hearing by the clerk of the court but failed to appear telephonically. The plaintiff has not contacted counsel for defendant or responded to the orders of the court to prepare a joint pretrial order or to commence preparation of proposed jury instructions. Accordingly, the court entered its order directing plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff has until May 4, 2011, to respond to the order to show cause. If plaintiff fails to do so, this action will be dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Aidnik v. Facility

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 20, 2011
2:08-cv-02583-HDM-RAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Aidnik v. Facility

Case Details

Full title:JEFF AIDNIK, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 20, 2011

Citations

2:08-cv-02583-HDM-RAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2011)