Opinion
SA-23-CV-01227-JKP
04-10-2024
AIADVERTISING, INC., Plaintiff, v. ITALEAU, INC., Defendant.
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JASON PULLIAM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney's Report and Recommendation recommending this case be dismissed for want of prosecution. See ECF No. 10. No party filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the time for doing so expired.
Any party who seeks review of all or a portion of a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation must serve and file specific written objections within fourteen days after being served with a copy. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2). If a party does not timely object to all or a portion of a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the District Court will review the unobjected-to proposed findings and recommendations to determine whether they are clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Johnson v. Sw. Research Inst., 210 F.Supp.3d 863, 864 (W.D. Tex. 2016) (citing U.S. v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989).
Court records reflect Judge Chestney issued the Report and Recommendation on February 5, 2024. See ECF No. 10. No party filed objections or a Motion for Extension of Time by the deadline of February 19, 2024.
Consistent with § 636(b)(1)(C) and Rule 72(b)(2), the Court reviewed the subject Report and Recommendation entered by Judge Chestney for clear error. This Court finds no such clear error. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS Magistrate Judge Chestney's findings and recommendation and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation.
This case is DISMISSED for want of prosecution. The Clerk of Court is instructed to CLOSE THIS CASE.
It is so ORDERED.