From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ahn v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 31, 2023
No. 12711-20 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 31, 2023)

Opinion

12711-20

03-31-2023

TAE Y. AHN & KEUM J. KIM AHN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND DECISION

Courtney D. Jones Judge

On February 6, 2023, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. That same day, this case was called from the calendar at the Dallas, Texas trial session of the Court. There was no appearance by or on behalf of petitioners. Counsel for respondent appeared and was heard. The Court then ordered petitioners to show cause, on or before March 8, 2023, why respondent's motion to dismiss should not be granted and a decision entered against them. To this date, the Court has not received a response to the Court's Order to Show Cause, objection to respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution, returned mail, or any other correspondence from petitioners.

Giving due regard to the representations contained in respondent's motion to dismiss, and due to petitioners' failure to respond to the Court's Order to Show Cause, failure to appear for trial, and failure to otherwise prosecute this case, it is

ORDERED that the Court's February 7, 2023, Order to Show Cause is made absolute. It is further

ORDERED that respondent's February 6, 2023, Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of prosecution. It is further

ORDERED and DECIDED that there is a deficiency in income tax due from petitioners for the taxable year 2018 in the amount of $9,807.


Summaries of

Ahn v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 31, 2023
No. 12711-20 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 31, 2023)
Case details for

Ahn v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:TAE Y. AHN & KEUM J. KIM AHN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Mar 31, 2023

Citations

No. 12711-20 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 31, 2023)